"Writes negative reviews irresponsibly"

He posted a negative review on Cerebro citing that founder shouldn’t be responding over every “hateful” driven comments. Let’s get the facts straight, I simply pointed out the reality that NFTs aren’t the project and are a separate vehicle outside. Couple of reasons why i have had to put it out there: 1. Nobody forced anyone to mint or buy the NFTs, period. People need to take personal accountability. 2. How is it fair to negatively review a project simply because price action didn’t go the way some users wanted? 3. Moreover, this is *checks watch* week 2 of the NFTs and they’re somehow written off as dead already? I don’t respond to all hate comments. But those that are senseless and baseless, i do and i will. It’s not ego, it’s simply putting out the facts in place

24 upvotes

September 4, 2025

Comments

0xdd

1299

Sep 4, 2025

Yoo Maverick, Im simply share my opinion about your socials management. And I still believe that your social management was poor. I don't care about the mint and the methodology used; in the review, I focus on your use of social media. I simply observe and give my opinion. Thanks for sharing your opinion, champ.

maverick

1853

Sep 4, 2025

Then you could have dmed me or written me a negative review? But attempting to fault a project for NFT price action is seriously wild, which was what I pointed out. I have no issues with them saying for e.g. product could have been better, customer support is terrible, btw. Maybe if those weren't your friends, it won't have colored your judgement. I don't understand why a founder cant defend their own project. I stand by my actions. You can have your pov and believe this is driven by "hate" or "ego", idc.