
This user uses 2 accounts in Ethos and is abusing the system. They were observed during the period of daily incentivized reviews. In this case, targeting the user [voh](https://app.ethos.network/profile/x/vohvohh). Their second account is [maxud.base.eth ∑](https://app.ethos.network/profile/0x6B3637d177791E09a3E26CA76D96D851EB917Fa4). Detection methodology: Neutral [review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702276/tarafsiz-duracam-proje-hakkinda-hic-bir-bilgim-yok) directed at Voh. Time: May 10, 2026 at 12:19 PM Neutral [review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702275/tarafsizim-projenin-tam-olarak-ne-oldugunu-bilmiyorum) directed at Voh from maxud.base.eth ∑. Time: May 10, 2026 at 12:17 PM Time interval between reviews: 2 minutes. Other logical connections: Both have ENS base. Both referred to the person as a "project" in their reviews. Social proof: maxud.base.eth ∑ posted on X an EVM address belonging to genesiseth.base.eth ∑, identifying it as their own profile. Post > (https://megalodon.jp/2026-0511-0928-04/https://x.com:443/maksud2278/status/1738251236208431294) [Screenshot](https://ibb.co/051NQMs) On-chain proof: Mutual transactions dating back to 2022. [Example](https://polygonscan.com/tx/0x7e4ee974edb77d5262df9bd4aaad8bfafb8009564b5dc7755846d52d05ff8c93) Shared Binance deposit address: 0x570f6e73b6758c31a9002f0d0f069ff0844fc96e Additionally: Identical pattern of behavior in incentivized reviews directed at the Abstract project. The interval between the reviews is 2 minutes, both are neutral, and both carry the same semantic meaning: [“IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME”](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702095/uzun-zaman-oldu) [“It took a long time”](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/702094/cok-bekletti)
Comments