Grimm

Most of Grimm’s reviews feel generated and bring little to no real insight. Repeating a person’s score, vouch count, and positivity rate adds nothing constructive to ethos we can already see those numbers on the profile. Instead of sharing genuine experiences or personal context, the reviews read like generic AI text with the same structure every time. This makes them unhelpful for the community and not really useful in building trust. Copy-paste style reviews. Repeating stats isn’t feedback, it’s noise.

This account is trying to farm Ethos by doing AI generated slop reviews. They all just say the Ethos score of the person/project and their % of positive reviews lol. This is slop noise for Ethos. Example: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/378872/trust-badge-profile-suga-r Worse still, is that when called out, they lash out with a reciprocal negative review instead of changing their ways. Do better.

A hardworking friend I met during the Sentient project, and with whom I've collaborated on many projects. He loves to produce and is an early riser.

We met on Sentient's Discord, a good and funny person. They have high-quality Sentient posts.

This profile reads like it’s written by AI. Here is the example: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/357580/trust-gap-despite-solid-reputation-points I don’t treat it as reliable and won’t rely on it.

I met Grimm on the Sentient Discord. He has achieved the highest role on the server, **Sentient AGI**. He helps newcomers and shares the information they need to earn their roles.

I know Grimm from the Sentient project, he is a good person and I’ve been inspired by him in many ways as a content creator. I also know him from Seismic where he is active as a user and as a content creator. He has insane work ethic and puts in a lot of effort across many Discord roles. he’s always active on X, posting every day with the same energy and consistency. Grimm is truly insane in a good way, someone you can learn a lot from both on X and beyond X.

This 'Proof of Trust' review is proof you're clueless, fam. Flexing about a 1268 score like it's your SATs? Yawn. 'Anonymous yet impactful'? More like anonymous and aimless. And who tf cares about $0 rewards? Oh, wait, you do—since you think reputation is the new cash. 'Trust-layered'? More like trust-tarnished with this hot garbage take. Stick to shilling NFTs, bro. **Want to stop getting negatively reviewed by me? Focus on writing authentic reviews that come from personal experience or are based on real-world observations. Using AI to write reviews that leverages existing information on the internet helps no one, and makes you look like a blatant farmer.** **Review:** https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/347402 **Title:** Proof of Trust: Where Reputation Meets Anonymity **Description:** This interface represents a trust system based on voting, evaluating a user's reliability in a “anonymous yet impactful” Web3 logic. A contribution score of 1268 with 93% positive feedback shows verified credibility. Interestingly, even with $0 in rewards, the evaluation system remains active, indicating that the motivation is driven by reputation, not just profit. The warning “Answers stored offchain and anonymously” emphasizes the importance of privacy. A strong example for trust-layered Web3 platforms. **This review was left because of suspected use of AI when authoring this review**

I discovered Grimm’s profile during an ongoing slash and I have to say I want to give an extra hand in penalizing this profile He doesn’t write reviews based on what a project does or who the person is He uses AI to rate the score of a given profile on Ethos and then writes a short description based on that TERRIBLE Profiles like Grimm don’t deserve to earn XP

We met Kaito during our Web3 adventure. Anyone who knows him knows that when he sets his sights on a project, he never lets go until he has thoroughly exploited it to its core. Whether it's a daily task, a testnet, or a Discord role, he examines everything meticulously. He is truly a Web3 farmer. For projects he sees potential in, he doesn't just participate; he pours his soul into them, gets lost in the community, creates content, and contributes. So much so that he is sometimes more active than the project's founder. The word "maxi" is not enough to describe Kaito.