"Promoter of a scam project (wallet drainer)"
The user [RetroChainer](https://megalodon.jp/2026-0528-0526-01/https://app.ethos.network:443/profile/x/RetroChainer) (their current name) has previously been caught supporting a fraudulent project that drained users' wallets. As a result, they received one [negative review](https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/701648/promoting-a-fake-polymarket-site-with-a-drainer). During a [slash-round](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/434/promoting-a-wallet-drainer) against the other promoter, it was revealed that the manager had contacted them via Telegram and entered into paid promotional [partnerships](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/434?replyId=69221). The terms included posts, retweets, and replies.
Several examples of past support are shown here. The archive reflects the state at the time of this review. Direct posts from the user may have been deleted earlier, after the project was exposed:
[Example](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/LV2Vr), [example](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/O6H7W), [example](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/V2L99), [example](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/W0CEd).
Recently, the scam project’s X account became active again, and according to available information, the manager has resumed offering deals through the same communication channels. Based on this, a [slash-round](https://app.ethos.network/activity/slash/439/an-account-created-for-the-drainer-poly-arb) was organized against PolyArbiter (PolyArb).
RetroChainer continues to support the scam project through reposts. The likelihood that this is a spontaneous repost is 0% - given that they are a content maker and their entire personal feed is filled with their own publications. Moreover, they have previously been caught engaging in partnerships, and as we all understand, they have a connection to PolyArb’s marketing manager.
Below are archived links showing new activity in support of PolyArb by RetroChainer.
Link to the [post](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/HNGFX) itself.
List of those who [reposted](https://ghostarchive.org/archive/p11nB) it.
If earlier the content makers were involved without realizing the nature of the project and its true goals, now that it’s happening again, everything takes on a completely different tone and a far greater seriousness of intent.
Based on this assessment, a separate slash-round will likely be organized against this user in the future. The profile must reflect a negative signal, as well as reduce their credibility score.