🪐 𝕄 𝕁 ✨

As one who speaks his truth, MJ is one of the best and most honest. I'm absolutely proud to have him as a friend and even a mentor at times when I need to learn something inside and out of web3. Thank you fellow existentialist, cheers to you.

Mj (or Master Jew as I know him lol) is part of a "Beta" group I happen to also be part of, The Speakeasy and in the months I've known him, he's always struck me as this hilarious guy who's always, somehow in the know of what's going on (I don't have the time to keep up tbh), but he seems cool and a lot of my other buddies trust him, so he's cool in my book.

A mix of humor, personal takes, and deeper thoughts. Posts jump between memes, tech curiosity, cultural topics, and broader social commentary, which gives the feed a very human feel The tone isnt polished or curated, more like someone thinking out loud and engaging honestly, even when views are unconventional. There’s also a lighter side through creative prompts and wholesome interactions.

i've known MJ for years now thanks to reputable NFT communities like The Plague, Space Riders, and CannaSapiens. He's a contributing member and he's hilarious on the timeline

The review provides some context, indicating that the reviewer was not affiliated with the DeGods projects, but still sees the downfall as unfortunate. The reviewer then states their opinion that the project went from being "top class" to becoming a "joke", and attributes this to the project leader abandoning the community. Overall Assessment: This appears to be a H-NEG-NO-INSULT type of review. The reviewer is expressing criticism of the project and its leadership, but is doing so in a factual, non-insulting manner. The review highlights the key issue - the project leader abandoning the community - as the main reason for the project's decline. Frieren's Response: Header: Honest critique, room to strengthen Body: Your review highlights a valid concern - the project leader's abandonment of the community seems to be the root cause of DeGods' downfall. The factual, unemotional tone makes your criticism credible. To make this even more impactful, you could add one or two concrete examples of how the community was let down, or point to specific actions/announcements from the leader that demonstrated the neglect. Grounding the review in verifiable details will help readers understand the full context and significance of what happened. Overall, this is a solid critique, and with a bit more substance, it could become a very useful warning for others. 📝 Original review: https://app.ethos.network/activity/review/564277

on e of the greatest community members you can meet in web3, so helpful, humble and funny. also he got ton of alpha bout nfts and memecoins which he shared with everyone and help others

MJ is a real pillar in The Plague NFT community. We both love the frogs, and I always appreciate his takes on politics and what’s going on in the space. We align with many things, and his perspective genuinely adds value. If you’re not following MJ yet, I’m not sure what you’re doing.